Wtf I’ve heard this before but wtf

Circumcision does not protect boys from penile problems infact it can cause them…. Link below range from Penile amputation to meatal stenosis
—-
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/2769863/

Total ablation of the penis after circumcision with electrocautery: a method of management and long-term followup.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9480641/?i=5&from=/2769863/related

Reconstruction of the penis after necrosis due to circumcision

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/18926238/?i=5&from=/9480641/related

Surgical management of penile amputation in children
—-
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/14501693/?i=2&from=/18926238/related

20-year experience with iatrogenic penile injury.
—–
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/20851685/?i=11&from=stenosis%20circumcision

Incidence of asymptomatic meatal stenosis in children following neonatal circumcision.
—–
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9539919/?i=5&from=/20851685/related

Post circumcision meatal stenosis: 12 years’ experience

CONCLUSION: Meatal stenosis is an under recognised complication of circumcision done in neonatal and nappy aged boys. Symptomatic presentation from meatal stenosis can be very late.

——
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17475991/?i=2&from=/16429216/related

Neonatal circumcision and penile inflammation in young boys.

The study found that rather than protecting against penile inflammation, neonatal circumcision increases the risk of penile inflammation, particularly in boys younger than 3 years old.

—–
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/9393302/?i=3&from=/17475991/related

Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: a prospective study.

CONCLUSIONS: There are significant variations of appearance in circumcised boys; clinical findings are much more common in these boys than previously reported in retrospective studies. The circumcised penis requires more care than the intact penis during the first 3 years of life. Parents should be instructed to retract and clean any skin covering the glans in circumcised boys, to prevent adhesions forming and debris from accumulating. Penile inflammation (balanitis) may be more common in circumcised boys; preputial stenosis (phimosis) affects circumcised and intact boys with equal frequency. The revision of circumcision for purely cosmetic reasons should be discouraged on both medical and ethical grounds.

—–
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/17806024/?i=35&from=/10893633/related

Is neonatal circumcision judicious?

CONCLUSIONS: From our study, circumcision at 5 months results in significantly fewer serious complications than circumcision in the neonatal period, irrespective of the method used. Therefore, neonatal circumcision should not be recommended.

——
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/m/pubmed/1953977/?i=120&from=/10893633/related

[Total denudation of the penis in circumcision. Description of a plastic technique for repair of the penis].

20121110-205703.jpg

20121116-202734.jpg

20121116-202739.jpg

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s